Resource Directory

This is the second report of the task (D4.7 being the first one) and it captures the formal mechanism of collaboration and development towards structuring a widened CESSDA network described the task 4.5. The main aim of this task was to create a collaborative structure between the CESSDA partners...

The task reviewed the state of play regarding specific data domains (data provided by academia, official statistics including administrative data, historical, health data and big data that means existing and emerging data types. Experiences and best practices are presented in this report with the...

This deliverable contains the second output of task 3.3 – national development plans for establishing data services in the social sciences in non-CESSDA member countries in Europe. The goal of task 3.3 of CESSDA SaW was to draw up individual national development plans for aspiring CESSDA Service...

CESSDA invited a researcher, trainer and Data Management Expert Guide (DMEG) co-author to raise awareness about the guide among researchers and trainers. Ricarda Braukmann (DANS), Patrícia Isabel Martins Miranda (ICS ULisboa) and Sothearath Seang (Eurodoc) each brought their perspectives to the d...

APIS' collection development policy, quality control checks, metadata requirements and list of preferred formats explained for researchers.

APIS mission and workflow explained

The complete application for Core Trust Seal (CTS) by APIS (September 2021). CTS offers a process of self-evaluation for digital repositories. The certification process consists of a set of 16 criteria with which a repository must comply.

APIS' data user conditions.

This webpage defines APIS data access conditions.

APIS' explanation to depositors on how data should be prepared and documented.