Resource Directory

Reproducibility and transparency can be regarded as a hallmark of research. The ability to reproduce research results in order to check their reliability is an important cornerstone of research that helps to guarantee the quality of research and to build on existing knowledge. The purpose of this...

While much effort has gone into developing tools and methods for collecting and analyzing social media data, there still is considerable uncertainty regarding the archiving of these data. This webinar brought together experts from various institutions that have experience in working with social m...

Social media data are increasingly used in the social sciences. Archiving social media data is associated with a number of specific practical, legal, and ethical challenges that researchers and archivists need to address. In addition, the documentation of social media data also has its own requir...

The webinar explores two facets of the FAIRification of services: the FAIR assessment framework for data services, and the features of FAIR repositories.

This guide provided by the SNSF gives an explanation of the FAIR principles and explains for each principle what are the researcher's responsibility and which requirements should be fulfilled by the repository.

This policy presents the few criteria upon which SODHA administrators decide to publish or not to publish a dataset that was submitted for review. It first gives a quick overview of the criteria, so that potential depositors can quickly know whether SODHA is the right repository for them or not;...

There is an urgent need to improve the infrastructure supporting the reuse of scholarly data. A diverse set of stakeholders—representing academia, industry, funding agencies, and scholarly publishers—have come together to design and jointly endorse a concise and measureable set of principles that...

This webpage presents the persistant identifiers used by DANS - DOIs - and reports FAQ on DOIs by reserachers.