Resource Directory

The CESSDA Data Access Policy has been developed to provide a set of principles for CESSDA Service Providers (SPs) covering common standards for the provision of data and metadata access. The policy also aims to demonstrate CESSDA’s commitment to open science while protecting both privacy and int...

This report provides an inventory of data formats and metadata standards that are currently used and relevant for the research infrastructures currently managed by the SSHOC main stakeholders, recommendations of specific formats and standards for increasing interoperability, and prioritisations f...

The effective exchange of metadata is critical for supporting a FAIR data ecosystem where researchers can seamlessly search for and access research data held in multiple repositories. This becomes tricky when research data from different scientific disciplines are ingested, using a variety of sta...

The Recommendations on FAIR Metrics for EOSC document contains an analysis of activities relevant to the definition of FAIR Metrics in the EOSC context. It makes recommendations on the definition and implementation of metrics, proposes a set of metrics for FAIR data in EOSC to be extensively test...

This report specifies the data access categories that are to be implemented in the CESSDA Data Catalogue. The discussion focuses on how the implementation can be done within the DDI framework which is the common metadata standard for CESSDA Service Providers and CDC Publishers. (The report was cr...

Assessing the FAIRness of your repository's data holdings can help you to identify areas where your service could be optimised to become more FAIR-enabling. This webinar will introduce the F-UJI assessment tool (https://www.fairsfair.eu/f-uji-automated-fair-data-assessment-tool) which was develop...

As part of the 2019 SERISS train-the-trainer workshop, Libby Bishop discusses ethical and legal issues for data.

To remedy the proliferation of FAIRness measurements based on different interpretations of the principles, the RDA Working Group “FAIR data maturity model” established in January 2019 aims to develop a common set of core assessment criteria for FAIRness, as an RDA Recommendation. In the course of...

License terms that users of data archived at AUSSDA are obliged to abide by.

Detailed information regarding digital management at ADP: acquisition and selection, ingest, archival storage, access, and workflow.